[Solved] In 1986, A, a married woman file a petition for adoption of C which was granted. In 2011, A filed a petition to rescind or nullify the decree invoking Article 185 of the Family Code requiring that the husband and wife must jointly adopt and the retroactive provision of the Family Code under Article 256. How do you think the court will decide?

Q.	In 1986, A, a married woman file a petition for adoption of C which was granted. In 2011, A filed a petition to rescind or nullify the decree invoking Article 185 of the Family Code requiring that the husband and wife must jointly adopt and the retroactive provision of the Family Code under Article 256. How do you think the court will decide?
A.	It will grant the petition because the law is mandatory with the use of the word “must”;
B.	It will grant the petition because of the retroactivity of the law;
C.	It will deny the petition because the retroactivity of the law will impair vested rights. (Rep v. Toledano)
D.	It will deny the petition because of the doctrine of immutability of judgment.
Answer» C. It will deny the petition because the retroactivity of the law will impair vested rights. (Rep v. Toledano)

1.5k

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Philippines Civil Law Society

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

Marvin was married to Charina on February 14, 1990. Charina gave birth to a baby girl she named Noreen. Due to irreconcilable differences, Marvin left the conjugal dwelling. Charina, on the other hand fell in love with David and they decided to live together as husband and wife on May 12, 1992. Six (6) years after or on September 8, 1998, Marvin died in an accident. Free at last, Charina and David decided to get married on February 14, 2000 executing an affidavit that they have been living together as husband and wife for more than five (5) years. The marriage took place but the solemnizing officer failed to execute an affidavit that he ascertained the qualifications of the contracting parties. Two (2) years later, Charina died living a considerable amount of properties. Noreen, assisted by her grandparents, filed a petition questioning the validity of her marriage to David. If you were the judge, how will you decide on the petition?
A and B are married. A filed a petition for adoption alone but B consented to the adoption by executing an affidavit of consent and testified in court giving his consent to the adoption. Will the petition prosper?
A & B are married. They have a 10-year old son, C. X & Y, who are childless filed a petition for adoption on June 16, 2010, seeking to adopt C. It was submitted for resolution on December 15, 2010. On December 31, 2010 C was playing with a neighbor D who is likewise a minor, using the airgun of C’s father. He pointed the gun to D, squeezed the trigger and killed D. the petition was granted on January 10, 2011. Who are liable?
A & B are married. They have a 10-year old son, C. X & Y, who are childless filed a petition for adoption on June 16, 2010, seeking to adopt C. It was submitted for resolution on December 15, 2010. On December 31, 2010 C was playing with a neighbor D who is likewise a minor, using the airgun of C’s father. He pointed the gun to D, squeezed the trigger and killed D. The petition was granted on January 10, 2011. Who may be liable?
Samson, the son of a wealthy family has always claimed that since childhood, he was not a boy. He played with the girls and did not mingle with the boys. After finishing his course at a university in the Philippines, he went to the US to take up his masteral and doctorate degrees. He consulted several doctors of the possibility of sex transmission from that of male to that of a female. The sex transmission was done in Thailand and which was certified as successful by a medical expert in Manila, hence, he claimed to be a woman. He filed a petition for correction of entry of his record of birth from male to female and his name from Samson to Delailah as he was marrying his fiancé. The lower court granted the petition. Is the order of the court correct?
X has a daughter Y. She left for Italy to look for a job and worked there for 10 years but continued to support Y who was left under the custody of A and B. They filed a petition for adoption but did not present evidence of consent of X contending that Y has been abandoned by X. How do you think the court will decide?
A & B lived together as husband and wife without the benefit of marriage. For a few months before his death, A was writing his autobiography and stated that he loved B so much and because of that, they decided to live together as husband and wife, but planned to marry. At the time he was writing his autobiography, B was pregnant and he stated in his autobiography that he was the father of the child inside the womb of B. He died without finishing it and failed to sign the same. Two (2) months thereafter, the child C, was born, hence, B sought to register the child under the name of A but the Local Civil Registrar refused, hence, she filed a suit for mandamus to compel the registrar to register the child under A’s name. She testified as narrated above; D, the father of A testified that during the lifetime of A he lived with B and she was pregnant at that time. E the brother of A likewise testified along the same line. Is the action of B correct?
A, a Russian citizen married B, a Filipina. A divorced B who came back to the Philippines and filed a petition for recognition of the foreign decree of divorce. It was recognized but the RTC of Manila found that A is not capacitated to remarry. Can B get married?
A, while travelling in Cananda executed a will before Philippine Consul B with only two (2) witnesses. Under Canadian Law, two (2) witnesses would suffice. When he arrived in the Philippines he filed a petition for probate. How do you think the court will decide?
A and B are married. A filed an action for declaration of nullity of their marriage on the ground of psychological incapacity. In its judgment, the court decreed that a final decree of nullity shall be issued only after there is partition, distribution of the properties in accordance with Article 147 of the Family Code.