[Solved] A, a Russian citizen married B, a Filipina. A divorced B who came back to the Philippines and filed a petition for recognition of the foreign decree of divorce. It was recognized but the RTC of Manila found that A is not capacitated to remarry. Can B get married?

Q.	A, a Russian citizen married B, a Filipina. A divorced B who came back to the Philippines and filed a petition for recognition of the foreign decree of divorce. It was recognized but the RTC of Manila found that A is not capacitated to remarry. Can B get married?
A.	Yes, because the decree of divorce severed her marital relationship with A;
B.	No, because despite the divorce, A’s national law does not give him the capacity to remarry;
C.	Yes, to be fair to B;
D.	Yes, because Philippine law cannot govern the capacity of a foreigner to remarry.
Answer» B. No, because despite the divorce, A’s national law does not give him the capacity to remarry;

3.6k

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Philippines Civil Law Society

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

A, an American citizen married B, a Filipina in the Philippines. A obtained a decree of divorce against B capacitating him to remarry under USA law. Can B remarry?
A & B are married. A became a member of the US Armed Forces but when he came back to the Philippines he found out that his wife was cohabiting with his brother. When he went back to the USA, he divorced B; then got married to C. He died and in the petition for settlement of his estate, B contended that she is entitled to inherit. Is B correct?
Samson, the son of a wealthy family has always claimed that since childhood, he was not a boy. He played with the girls and did not mingle with the boys. After finishing his course at a university in the Philippines, he went to the US to take up his masteral and doctorate degrees. He consulted several doctors of the possibility of sex transmission from that of male to that of a female. The sex transmission was done in Thailand and which was certified as successful by a medical expert in Manila, hence, he claimed to be a woman. He filed a petition for correction of entry of his record of birth from male to female and his name from Samson to Delailah as he was marrying his fiancé. The lower court granted the petition. Is the order of the court correct?
Marvin was married to Charina on February 14, 1990. Charina gave birth to a baby girl she named Noreen. Due to irreconcilable differences, Marvin left the conjugal dwelling. Charina, on the other hand fell in love with David and they decided to live together as husband and wife on May 12, 1992. Six (6) years after or on September 8, 1998, Marvin died in an accident. Free at last, Charina and David decided to get married on February 14, 2000 executing an affidavit that they have been living together as husband and wife for more than five (5) years. The marriage took place but the solemnizing officer failed to execute an affidavit that he ascertained the qualifications of the contracting parties. Two (2) years later, Charina died living a considerable amount of properties. Noreen, assisted by her grandparents, filed a petition questioning the validity of her marriage to David. If you were the judge, how will you decide on the petition?
A, an American citizen is married to B, a Filipina. Through the pension and savings of A, they acquired a residential lot in Manila, but it was registered under B’s name. B sold the property to C. Can A seek to recover the property?
A and B both Filipinos, are married. They bought a property but not covered by a title. They migrated to the USA and became American citizens. When they came back for vacation, they filed a petition for registration of the land. Will the petition prosper?
In 1986, A, a married woman file a petition for adoption of C which was granted. In 2011, A filed a petition to rescind or nullify the decree invoking Article 185 of the Family Code requiring that the husband and wife must jointly adopt and the retroactive provision of the Family Code under Article 256. How do you think the court will decide?
A and B are married. A filed a petition for adoption alone but B consented to the adoption by executing an affidavit of consent and testified in court giving his consent to the adoption. Will the petition prosper?
Glenda, a Filipino citizen and John Riel, an Australian citizen, got married in the consular office of the Philippines in Australia. According to the laws of Australia, a marriage solemnized by a consular official is valid, provided that such marriage is celebrated in accordance with the laws of such consular official. What is the status of the marriage of Glenda and John Riel?
A & B are married with children C & D, but were living separately from one another. A got married to E and begot children, F & G. After his death, E, F & G filed a petition for settlement of his estate. B, C &D intervened to claim their share of the estate and contended that since F & G are illegitimate as the marriage of A & E is void, their share is only ½ of the share of the legitimates. Is the contention correct?