[Solved] A & B are married. A became a member of the US Armed Forces but when he came back to the Philippines he found out that his wife was cohabiting with his brother. When he went back to the USA, he divorced B; then got married to C. He died and in the petition for settlement of his estate, B contended that she is entitled to inherit. Is B correct?

Q.	A & B are married. A became a member of the US Armed Forces but when he came back to the Philippines he found out that his wife was cohabiting with his brother. When he went back to the USA, he divorced B; then got married to C. He died and in the petition for settlement of his estate, B contended that she is entitled to inherit. Is B correct?
A.	B is correct because of the original relationship between A & B.
B.	B is not correct because what governs the successional rights of A is his national law.
C.	B is correct because in Philippine law as A is only an American citizen from the point of view of USA law.
D.	B is correct because she acquired a vested right when they got married.
Answer» B. B is not correct because what governs the successional rights of A is his national law.

693

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Philippines Civil Law Society

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

A & B are married with children C & D, but were living separately from one another. A got married to E and begot children, F & G. After his death, E, F & G filed a petition for settlement of his estate. B, C &D intervened to claim their share of the estate and contended that since F & G are illegitimate as the marriage of A & E is void, their share is only ½ of the share of the legitimates. Is the contention correct?
Marvin was married to Charina on February 14, 1990. Charina gave birth to a baby girl she named Noreen. Due to irreconcilable differences, Marvin left the conjugal dwelling. Charina, on the other hand fell in love with David and they decided to live together as husband and wife on May 12, 1992. Six (6) years after or on September 8, 1998, Marvin died in an accident. Free at last, Charina and David decided to get married on February 14, 2000 executing an affidavit that they have been living together as husband and wife for more than five (5) years. The marriage took place but the solemnizing officer failed to execute an affidavit that he ascertained the qualifications of the contracting parties. Two (2) years later, Charina died living a considerable amount of properties. Noreen, assisted by her grandparents, filed a petition questioning the validity of her marriage to David. If you were the judge, how will you decide on the petition?
A, a Russian citizen married B, a Filipina. A divorced B who came back to the Philippines and filed a petition for recognition of the foreign decree of divorce. It was recognized but the RTC of Manila found that A is not capacitated to remarry. Can B get married?
A & B lived together as husband and wife without the benefit of marriage. For a few months before his death, A was writing his autobiography and stated that he loved B so much and because of that, they decided to live together as husband and wife, but planned to marry. At the time he was writing his autobiography, B was pregnant and he stated in his autobiography that he was the father of the child inside the womb of B. He died without finishing it and failed to sign the same. Two (2) months thereafter, the child C, was born, hence, B sought to register the child under the name of A but the Local Civil Registrar refused, hence, she filed a suit for mandamus to compel the registrar to register the child under A’s name. She testified as narrated above; D, the father of A testified that during the lifetime of A he lived with B and she was pregnant at that time. E the brother of A likewise testified along the same line. Is the action of B correct?
A and B both Filipinos, are married. They bought a property but not covered by a title. They migrated to the USA and became American citizens. When they came back for vacation, they filed a petition for registration of the land. Will the petition prosper?
Samson, the son of a wealthy family has always claimed that since childhood, he was not a boy. He played with the girls and did not mingle with the boys. After finishing his course at a university in the Philippines, he went to the US to take up his masteral and doctorate degrees. He consulted several doctors of the possibility of sex transmission from that of male to that of a female. The sex transmission was done in Thailand and which was certified as successful by a medical expert in Manila, hence, he claimed to be a woman. He filed a petition for correction of entry of his record of birth from male to female and his name from Samson to Delailah as he was marrying his fiancé. The lower court granted the petition. Is the order of the court correct?
A & B are married. They have children, C & D. C is married to X and they have children, Y & Z. D is married to S and they have children, T & U. He has likewise an illegitimate child, V. Before A died he executed a will instituting his heirs including V. Can V inherit from A considering that he is an illegitimate child of D?
A & B are married. They have a son C who is married to D with children, E & F. C & D adopted G. C died in 2006. A died in 2010. Can G inherit by right of representation?
A is both a Chinese and a Japanese. While in Manila he died leaving properties in the Philippines. Before he died, he was a domicile of Japan. How should Philippine courts adjudicate the successional right to his estate?
A checked in at ABC Hotel Corporation with his valuables. While shopping nearby, she left the room for half a day but when she went back, all his valuables were gone as her room was ransacked with the use of force. She filed a complaint for damages. Is the hotel keeper liable?