[Solved] A and B lived together as husband and wife. A brought B to the hospital, and paid for the expenses in the birth of C. When the nurse asked B who was the father of the child, she mentioned the name of A but did not sign the record of birth of C. Can the record of birth be admissible in evidence as proof of filiation?

Q.	A and B lived together as husband and wife. A brought B to the hospital, and paid for the expenses in the birth of C. When the nurse asked B who was the father of the child, she mentioned the name of A but did not sign the record of birth of C. Can the record of birth be admissible in evidence as proof of filiation?
A.	Yes, because of the acts of A, thus, he is estopped;
B.	No, because otherwise it would be easy for a woman to vest legitimate status upon a child even if the latter is illegitimate;
C.	Yes, to protect the status of the child;
D.	Yes, to be fair to the child.
Answer» B. No, because otherwise it would be easy for a woman to vest legitimate status upon a child even if the latter is illegitimate;

874

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Philippines Civil Law Society

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

A & B lived together as husband and wife without the benefit of marriage. For a few months before his death, A was writing his autobiography and stated that he loved B so much and because of that, they decided to live together as husband and wife, but planned to marry. At the time he was writing his autobiography, B was pregnant and he stated in his autobiography that he was the father of the child inside the womb of B. He died without finishing it and failed to sign the same. Two (2) months thereafter, the child C, was born, hence, B sought to register the child under the name of A but the Local Civil Registrar refused, hence, she filed a suit for mandamus to compel the registrar to register the child under A’s name. She testified as narrated above; D, the father of A testified that during the lifetime of A he lived with B and she was pregnant at that time. E the brother of A likewise testified along the same line. Is the action of B correct?
Marvin was married to Charina on February 14, 1990. Charina gave birth to a baby girl she named Noreen. Due to irreconcilable differences, Marvin left the conjugal dwelling. Charina, on the other hand fell in love with David and they decided to live together as husband and wife on May 12, 1992. Six (6) years after or on September 8, 1998, Marvin died in an accident. Free at last, Charina and David decided to get married on February 14, 2000 executing an affidavit that they have been living together as husband and wife for more than five (5) years. The marriage took place but the solemnizing officer failed to execute an affidavit that he ascertained the qualifications of the contracting parties. Two (2) years later, Charina died living a considerable amount of properties. Noreen, assisted by her grandparents, filed a petition questioning the validity of her marriage to David. If you were the judge, how will you decide on the petition?
A and B lived together as husband and wife, resulting in the birth of C. A recognized his son, C in the record of birth. What is the surname of C?
A, a man & B, a woman, lived together as husband and wife without the benefit of marriage, resulting in the birth of C. A signed the record of birth of C. Who has a better right of custody over C?
A & B, without the benefit of marriage lived together as husband and wife. They begot C. A, the father adopted C to elevate him to the status of legitimacy. What is the middle name of the child?
A & B, without the benefit of marriage lived together as husband and wife. They had no legal impediment to marry one another. A was engaged in business. B was at home taking care of their children and the household chores and helping A once in a while in the business but without any compensation. If the relationship ends, is B entitled to a share?
Clara thinking of her morality, drafted a will and asked Roberta, Hannah, Luisa and Benjamin to be witnesses during the day of the signing of her will, Clara fell down the stairs and broke both her arms. Coming from the hospitals, Clara insisted on signing her will by thumb mark and said that she can sign her full name later. While the will was being signed, Roberta, experienced a stomach ache and kept going to the restroom for long period of time. Hannah while waiting for her turn to sign the will, was reading the 7th Harry Potter book on the couch, beside the table on which everyone was signing Benjamin, aside from witnessing the will. Also offered to notarize it. A week after, Clara was run over by a drunk driver while crossing the street in Greenbelt. May the will of Clara be admitted to probate? Give your reasons briefly.
On March 3, 1995, wife delivered a child at which time the husband has been harboring the suspicion of her unfaithfulness. He has since been contemplating on impugning the legitimacy of the child until he met an accident and died on March 27, 1996. The legitimacy of the child may be impugned by:
A & B, lived together as husband and wife while A is legally married with children. They acquired properties in their coverture. After the death of A, where will his share go?
Which is not a proof of filiation?