In the question above, A, B and C agreed to use the amount of P100M left by their parents for the development of the land. D disagreed. Is D’s act correct?

Related MCQs

• A, B, C and D are the heirs of X and Y who left an estate of 10 hectares in Laguna. The three (3) brothers agreed to convert the land from a riceland to a subdivision. D, the sister disagreed. Is D’s act valid and what is the remedy of the brothers?
• In 1980, during the lifetime of A’s parents he executed a waiver of right over his future inheritance in favor of his brother B. A predeceased his parents. After the death of his parents in 2010, B obtained a title over the whole estate. Can A’s children recover their father’s share?
• Amelia and Arsenio are married. Amelia went to the U.S. to work as a nurse in 2005. She left her two (2) children, Benjie and Cherry, 4 years old and 2 years old, respectively, with her parents, Danilo and Elenita. Later, because his parents-in-law, do not want to give his children to him, Arsenio, through trickery, was able to get his children from their maternal grandparents. Danilo and Elenita are claiming that they have a better right to have custody over Benjie and Cherry since they are financially capable of supporting the needs of the children. Can the grandparents claim back the children?
• A is indebted to ABC Corporation in the amount of P100M. Despite efforts to collect from A, the latter failed to pay due to business reverses as he has no more assets. In order to maintain a more accurate inventory of the worth of its current assets, ABC Corp. was forced to write-off A’s obligation. One (1) year later, A won the lotto draw in the US in the amount of $100M. Learning of the good luck of A, it demanded for payment, but A refused to pay contending that his obligation was extinguished when it was written-off. Is A correct?
• X and Y are married. They have a daughter Z. They are living in the house of Y’s parents, but left the house because of differences with his parents-in-law and his wife due to her refusal to leave the house. He was prevented from visiting his child and the latter was prevented from seeing her father? What is the remedy of X?
• Wendy, single, bought a parcel of land in Dagupan City from Amante for P600,000.00. A contract was executed between them which already vested upon Wendy full ownership of the property, although payable in monthly installments for a period of 4 years. One year after the execution of the contract, Wendy got married to Lorenzo. They executed a marriage settlement whereby they agreed that their properties shall be governed by the regime of conjugal partnership of gains. Thereafter, subsequent installments were paid from the conjugal partnership funds. Is the land conjugal or paraphernal?
• A is a contractor, building roads for the government which has not paid him P100M. Before he filed his income tax returns, he wrote a letter to the BIR Commissioner proposing a set-off between the State and A considering that his tax liability amounts to P10M and the State has not paid him despite demand. Is A correct?
• S and B entered into a sale of a four-hectare land for P1 million. S prepared the Deed of Sale and with fraudulent intent and taking advantage of B'’ failing eyesight changed the area of the land to reflect an area less than what had been agreed upon. The remedy of B upon discovery of the fraud is,
• A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 1. Through an oral agreement between B & A. A agreed that the property be registered under the name of B so that he can use it in securing a loan with Metrobank. When A sought to recover the property from B, the latter refused contending that he was the owner of the same. Is the contention of B correct?
• X and Y entered into a contract. X agreed to deposit P50,000 with Y’s account to make it appear that Y had sufficient capitalization in forming an incorporation. They agreed that Y should return the money plus 12% interest within 30 days. What is the nature of the contract?