In the establishment of an easement of right of way which is likened to the exercise of the power of eminent domain, the owner can validly contend that the compensation due the owner should be computed based on the

Related MCQs

• A & B had an agreement for A to use B’s property as a right of way. Five (5) years later, an adequate outlet was opened to a highway near A’s property, hence, B filed an action to cancel the encumbrance of voluntary easement of right of way. The RTC granted. The CA may rule that:
• A entered into a contract of sale with pacto de retro over B’s house & lot. The house is valued at P10M. B failed to exercise the right to repurchase. State the effect of B’s failure to exercise the right to repurchase.
• The following are the requisites of the easement of right of way, except.
• A tolerated B to use his land, hence, B constructed a road where his trucks would pass through, going in and out of his land. Fifty (50) years thereafter, A asked B to pay rentals but B refused contending that he has already acquired ownership over the easement of right of way by prescription. Is B correct?
• What is the test in determining whether a person may demand an easement of right of way?
• Easement is always a real right.
• Which statement is correct? 1. Accession is the right of an owner of a property to everything which is produced thereby or which is incorporated or attached thereto either naturally or artificially. 2. Natural, industrial and civil fruits belong to the owner.
• Which one is more burdensome, easement or usufruct?
• A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 1. Through an oral agreement between B & A. A agreed that the property be registered under the name of B so that he can use it in securing a loan with Metrobank. When A sought to recover the property from B, the latter refused contending that he was the owner of the same. Is the contention of B correct?
• Negative easement may be acquired by prescription through notarial prohibition.