[Solved] A executed a deed of donation to the DECS subject to the condition that it be devoted for educational purposes. The DECS did not accept it in the same instrument or in an authentic writing but took possession of the property and constructed a school building. Twenty (20) years thereafter, it executed a deed of exchange with B for a bigger property. Can A revoke the donation?

Q.	A executed a deed of donation to the DECS subject to the condition that it be devoted for educational purposes. The DECS did not accept it in the same instrument or in an authentic writing but took possession of the property and constructed a school building. Twenty (20) years thereafter, it executed a deed of exchange with B for a bigger property. Can A revoke the donation?
A.	A can ask for the recoveyance of the property because the donation is void as it was not accepted by DECS in the same instrument.
B.	A cannot ask for reconveyance because there was acceptance thru DECS possession and compliance with the condition.
C.	A can recover because DECS did not comply with the condition.
D.	A cannot recover because of prescription.
Answer» B. A cannot ask for reconveyance because there was acceptance thru DECS possession and compliance with the condition.

747

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Philippines Civil Law Society

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

A executed a deed of donation in favor of B who accepted it. It however states that the donation will take effect upon A’s death and B cannot alienate, but it further states that B can register the deed and obtain a title. What is the nature of the donation?
A constructed a building for B. Twenty-five (25) years thereafter, the building collapsed due to lack of necessary repairs resulting in the death of 10 tenants of the building. Who is liable?
A was charged with the crime of murder. He was convicted. While in prison, he executed a donation in favor of B which was accepted by B in the same deed of donation. Is the donation valid?
A & B lived together as husband and wife without the benefit of marriage. For a few months before his death, A was writing his autobiography and stated that he loved B so much and because of that, they decided to live together as husband and wife, but planned to marry. At the time he was writing his autobiography, B was pregnant and he stated in his autobiography that he was the father of the child inside the womb of B. He died without finishing it and failed to sign the same. Two (2) months thereafter, the child C, was born, hence, B sought to register the child under the name of A but the Local Civil Registrar refused, hence, she filed a suit for mandamus to compel the registrar to register the child under A’s name. She testified as narrated above; D, the father of A testified that during the lifetime of A he lived with B and she was pregnant at that time. E the brother of A likewise testified along the same line. Is the action of B correct?
A executed a deed of donation in favor of B and sent it to Ilocos Norte. One month later A became insane and still insane when he received the notice of acceptance of the donation. He died without recovering his sanity. Is the donation valid?
Spouses Reynaldo and Ana decided to separate and to voluntary dissolve their conjugal partnership. Hence, they executed a public document wherein they declare that they had no debts, that they were voluntarily dissolving their conjugal partnership, and that each of them would thereafter be free to acquire or dispose of any property independently of the other. Thereafter, they lived apart. Ana engaged in business which unfortunately failed. Reynaldo, on the other hand, continued to be gainfully employed and was able to acquire properties through his own efforts. The creditors of Ana obtained a judgment against the latter which they could not satisfy because Ana was insolvent. Could the creditors of Ana obtain satisfaction of the judgment out of the properties of Reynaldo?
The deed of donation by A in favor of B states: “Donation Inter Vivos” but there is a provision that although the land donated shall be delivered to the donee immediately upon perfection of the same with right to enjoy the fruits of the land, it will pass to the donee after the death of the donor. After the donor’s death, the heirs sought to recover the property. Will the action prosper?
A donated a house and lot to B orally. Since then, B has been in possession for a period of 30 years declaring the same for taxation purposes. Is the donation valid?
Wendy, single, bought a parcel of land in Dagupan City from Amante for P600,000.00. A contract was executed between them which already vested upon Wendy full ownership of the property, although payable in monthly installments for a period of 4 years. One year after the execution of the contract, Wendy got married to Lorenzo. They executed a marriage settlement whereby they agreed that their properties shall be governed by the regime of conjugal partnership of gains. Thereafter, subsequent installments were paid from the conjugal partnership funds. Is the land conjugal or paraphernal?
A tolerated B to use his land, hence, B constructed a road where his trucks would pass through, going in and out of his land. Fifty (50) years thereafter, A asked B to pay rentals but B refused contending that he has already acquired ownership over the easement of right of way by prescription. Is B correct?