A & B entered into a contract of sale, A, obligating himself to deliver his house and lot to B who obligated himself to pay P2M upon delivery. B has already paid, but A has not delivered the house and lot despite demand. State the remedy of B.

Related MCQs

• A and B entered into a contract for A to manufacture boxes to be used by B for his export business. B paid the amount of P2M, but A failed to manufacture the boxes despite repeated follow-up of the immediate production of the boxes. B filed a complaint for reimbursement of the P2M.
• A & B entered into a contract of pledge, where B delivered his car to A as security for the payment of an obligation in the amount of P2M. For failure of B to pay what is the remedy of A?
• A & B entered into a contract of sale over A’s car for P500,000.00. A has to register the car first before payment and delivery. After the registration of the car, A called up B that the car was ready for pick up. B asked him to send his driver to deliver the car as he was going to pay before delivery. B was able to convince the driver to leave the car at his garage and will just deposit the amount with A’s account for fear that the driver might be the subject of a hold-up. Instead of depositing the amount, he sold the car to C. Can A recover the car from C?
• A entered into a contract of sale over B’s house and lot but since there is a balance which remained unpaid, A executed a mortgage over the house and lot. A failed to pay. Can B rescind the contract?
• Jose is under obligation to deliver to Pedro, at the option of Jose, a car, a pick-up truck, or a van, all of which are specific. No. 1 - If the car and the pick-up truck were lost through Jose’s fault, he has no choice but to deliver the van; If the van was lost through a fortuitous event before delivery, the obligation is extinguished and Jose is not liable. No. 2 - If the pick-up truck and the car were lost through a fortuitous event, Jose has no choice but to deliver the van; if before delivery, the van was lost because of Jose’s fault, he is liable.
• A and B entered into a contract of sale over A’s property. The document that evidences the contract did not state how much was paid, but A delivered the property to B. What is the nature of the contract?
• A entered into a contract whereby he obligated himself to pay B on or before September in the form of Australian currency. When the obligation became due and demandable, A delivered to B Australian currency. Is A correct?
• A built his house on his lot up to the boundary line and opened windows with direct view over the lot of B. Twenty (20) years later, B built his house up to the boundary line of his lot, hence, A filed a complaint enjoining B from building his house up to the boundary contending that he has acquired the easement of light and view by prescription and that B cannot build less than 3 meters from the boundary. Is A correct?
• A entered into a contract to sell over a residential lot. He has already paid more than 2 years installments. Thereafter, he failed to pay. What right does A have if the contract is cancelled?
• Magdalene and Shantung Company entered into a contract of agency before the consul general of the Philippines in Singapore. They stipulated that Magdalene shall be the administrator of the real properties of Shantung Company in the said country. By virtue of the said contract, Magdalene sold the 1 hectare land of Shantung Company located in Singapore to Mayhem Real Estate Corporation without any special power of attorney. The said contract of sale was executed before the vice consul of the Philippines in Singapore. Under the laws of Singapore, the sale of a real property by an agent without a special power of attorney is valid. Shantung Company filed a suit for the annulment of the contract of sale on the ground that Magdalene has no authority to sell the property. If you were the judge, which of the following courses of action should you take?