A built his house on his lot up to the boundary line and opened windows with direct view over the lot of B. Twenty (20) years later, B built his house up to the boundary line of his lot, hence, A filed a complaint enjoining B from building his house up to the boundary contending that he has acquired the easement of light and view by prescription and that B cannot build less than 3 meters from the boundary. Is A correct?

Related MCQs

• A tolerated B to use his land, hence, B constructed a road where his trucks would pass through, going in and out of his land. Fifty (50) years thereafter, A asked B to pay rentals but B refused contending that he has already acquired ownership over the easement of right of way by prescription. Is B correct?
• X and Y entered into a contract of sale over a parcel of land with an area of 4,000 square meters more or less. When the title was issued, it was 14,475 sq. meters. The buyer contended that he owned the whole lot of 14,475 sq. meters as it was sold in lump sum, hence, the seller should deliver the whole lot. Is the buyer correct?
• A & B had an agreement for A to use B’s property as a right of way. Five (5) years later, an adequate outlet was opened to a highway near A’s property, hence, B filed an action to cancel the encumbrance of voluntary easement of right of way. The RTC granted. The CA may rule that:
• A & B entered into an oral contract of sale of A’s car worth P4.5M where the object was supposed to be delivered upon payment of the price. When A went to B’s house to pay the price, the latter refused to sell hence, a complaint for specific performance was filed by A. will the complaint prosper?
• A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 123 located in a subdivision property being developed by XYZ Corporation. He did not know the exact location of the lot, hence, he consulted the developer who pointed to a lot, hence, he constructed his house. It turned out that it was another lot covered by TCT No. 124. Is A a builder in good faith?
• The Municipality of Dingras, Ilocos Norte conducted a bidding on the lot belonging to Mr. P for non-payment of tax. A was the highest bidder. P was not able to redeem his property, hence, a title was issued in favor of A. He filed a motion for the issuance of a writ of possession over the house and lot. What is the right of Mr. P?
• Negative easement may be acquired by prescription through notarial prohibition.
• A & B lived together as husband and wife without the benefit of marriage. For a few months before his death, A was writing his autobiography and stated that he loved B so much and because of that, they decided to live together as husband and wife, but planned to marry. At the time he was writing his autobiography, B was pregnant and he stated in his autobiography that he was the father of the child inside the womb of B. He died without finishing it and failed to sign the same. Two (2) months thereafter, the child C, was born, hence, B sought to register the child under the name of A but the Local Civil Registrar refused, hence, she filed a suit for mandamus to compel the registrar to register the child under A’s name. She testified as narrated above; D, the father of A testified that during the lifetime of A he lived with B and she was pregnant at that time. E the brother of A likewise testified along the same line. Is the action of B correct?
• X has a daughter Y. She left for Italy to look for a job and worked there for 10 years but continued to support Y who was left under the custody of A and B. They filed a petition for adoption but did not present evidence of consent of X contending that Y has been abandoned by X. How do you think the court will decide?
• A constructed a building for B. Twenty-five (25) years thereafter, the building collapsed due to lack of necessary repairs resulting in the death of 10 tenants of the building. Who is liable?