Q.

A courted B and promised to marry her. The wedding was set on February 14, 2011 but at the date set for the celebration. A did not appear at the church. B sued A for damages for breach of promise to marry alleging that all preparations have been made and there were so many people who attended their scheduled wedding. She knew however that A was married but still submitted herself to sexual desires of A. Is A liable?

A. A is not liable because mere breach of promise to marry is not an actionable wrong.
B. A is liable because he caused sleepless nights, wounded feelings to B by not appearing at the church.
C. B is not entitled to damages because of mutual lust.
D. B has to bear her own losses.
Answer» C. B is not entitled to damages because of mutual lust.
639
0
Do you find this helpful?
2

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs