[Solved] A filed an application for confirmation of imperfect or incomplete title. B filed an opposition alleging that the land is part of the inalienable lands of the State. Is B correct?

Q.	A filed an application for confirmation of imperfect or incomplete title. B filed an opposition alleging that the land is part of the inalienable lands of the State. Is B correct?
A.	Yes, because anyone can invoke the interest of the State;
B.	No, because only the State can invoke its interest;
C.	Yes, by reason of public policy;
D.	Yes, because any Filipino is a real party in interest.
Answer» B. No, because only the State can invoke its interest;

1.5k

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Philippines Civil Law Society

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

A filed an application for confirmation of imperfect or incomplete title over a parcel of land. It was dismissed. Can A re-file the same?
A & B are married. During the marriage B filed an action for legal separation alleging that A shot her and seriously wounded her resulting in her permanent disability. Will the action prosper?
Mr. Ayco offered to sell his land to Mr. Cruz for P300,000. Mr. Cruz accepted the offer and paid Mr. Ayco the purchase price. Mr. Ayco delivered the owner’s duplicate of the Transfer Certificate of title of the land. Mr. Cruz wants to register the land in his name but the Register of Deeds asks Mr. Cruz for the Deed of Sale. What can Mr. Cruz do?
A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 1 consisting of 10,000 square meters more of less adjoining the river bank. Accretion was formed which has been in the possession of B in 1990, but it was disposed of by the Director of Lands to B in s2010. Is the Director correct?
Mr. Tiok Chua executed a last will and testament. X, a niece was charged with the crime of forgery alleging that she forged Mr. Chua’s signature. In the meantime, the will was admitted to probate. State the effect of the admission of the will to probate.
A and B both Filipinos, are married. They bought a property but not covered by a title. They migrated to the USA and became American citizens. When they came back for vacation, they filed a petition for registration of the land. Will the petition prosper?
A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by a TCT No. 1. B stole the title, forged his signature and transferred it under his name. TCT No. 2 was issued under his name. He sold it to C who registered under his name. When returned to the Philippine in 2010, he discovered that his title was transferred to another. Can he recover the same?
In an application for land registration, there was an opposition. Can the oppositor pray for affirmative relief that he be declared the owner?
A executed a will consisting of ten pages. At the probate, B, one of his children interposed an opposition on the ground that one of the pages of the same has not been signed by A and one of the witnesses. Rule on the opposition.
A sold a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 9 to B. At the time of the sale, B knew that C has been in possession of the parcel of land as early as 10 years before the sale. B however checked with the Registry of Deeds and found the title to be clean. Is B a buyer in good faith?