Where the relief claimed by the plaintiff is undervalued and the valuation is not corrected within the time fixed or extended by the Court–

Related MCQs

• A defendant to a suit against whom no relief is claimed is called
• Which of the following deals with the duty of defendant to produce documents upon which relief is claimed or relied upon by him in the Code of Civil Procedure?
• Court may order defendant or plaintiff to appear in person under which of the following in the Code of Civil Procedure?
• In which of the following way notwithstanding that the former suit was disposed of, a matter will be said to have been „heard and finally decided‟? I. Ex parte II. By dismissal under O. 17 r 3, but not when the dismissal is under O. 16 r 1 for the failure to pay adjournment cost III. By a decree on an award IV. By oath tendered under s. 8 of the Indian Oaths Act, 1873 V. By dismissal owing to plaintiff’s failure to adduce evidence at the hearing
• Which of the following deals with the dismissal of suit where summons not served in consequence of plaintiff‟s failure to pay costs in the Code of Civil Procedure?
• The doctrine which place emphasis on the plaintiff’s duty to exhaust all available grounds in support of his claim–
• Which of the following deals with when plaintiff sues as representatives in the Code of Civil Procedure?
• A person can be made a party in the suit either as a plaintiff or a defendant:
• A, claiming to be the chela and heir of a deceased mohunt sues B for rent of certain lands forming part of the estate of the mohunt. C claims that he, and not A, is the chela and heir of the deceased and that he is entitled to the rent. C is thereupon jointed as a defendant to the suit. The issues raised are: Whether A or C is the chela and heir of the mohunt? Whether any and if so what rent is due from B? The Court finds that A is the chela and heir of the mohunt. It also finds Rs. 2,500 due by B for rent, and A‟s claim is decreed. Subsequently, C sues A for a declaration that he is the chela and heir of the mohunt and claims that as such he is entitled to the whole of the property left by the mohunt. A contends that the question, who is the chela and heir of the deceased, is res judicata.
• Mesne profit can be claimed with respect to