McqMate
Sign In
Hamberger menu
McqMate
Sign in
Sign up
Home
Forum
Search
Ask a Question
Sign In
McqMate Copyright © 2024
→
Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy (BA Philo...
→
Symbolic Logic
→
Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent- is ...
Q.
Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent- is symbolized as
A.
P Ͻ q
B.
P Ͻ q
C.
P Ͻ q
D.
P Ͻ q
Answer» C. P Ͻ q
1.6k
0
Do you find this helpful?
3
View all MCQs in
Symbolic Logic
Discussion
No comments yet
Login to comment
Related MCQs
“it is not the case that the antecedent is true and the consequent is false” is symbolized as……………………………………….
Fallacy of Denyingthe Antecedent- is symbolized as
‘If antecedent, then consequent’ is a general form of .______.
Modus Ponens means _______ the antecedent and the consequent.
A conditional statement asserts that in any case in which it’s antecedent is true, it’s consequent is ……………………………
No real connection between antecedent and consequent is suggested by …………
Any conditional with a true antecedent and a false consequent must ____________
The symbolization for “it is not the case that the antecedent is true and the consequent is false” is _________________
‘If p, then q and r’ is symbolized as _________.
‘If a and b, then c’ is symbolized as _________.