In which of the following circumstances a contract can be treated as discharged under the concept of supervening impossibility?

Related MCQs

• In which of the following circumstances a contract can be treated as discharged under the concept of supervening impossibility?
• Which of the following case is not covered by the concept of supervening impossibility?
• Because of supervening event, the promisor is excused from the performance of the contract. This is known as
• A contract is discharged by the breach when a party to a contract
• The doctrine of impossibility of performance, rendering a contract void, is based on
• When a person has done some work under a contract and the other party repudiates the contract, then the party who performed the work can claim remuneration for the work done. This is based on the principle of
• A contract in which, under the terms of a contract, nothing remains to be done by either party is known as
• A contract in which, under the terms of a contract, one or both the parties have still to perform their obligations in future is known as
• A surety is discharged from the liability by
• A surety is NOT discharged from his liability: