[Solved] If a compulsory heir is disinherited, is it limited to his legitime?

Q.	If a compulsory heir is disinherited, is it limited to his legitime?
A.	No, it also covers the free portion.
B.	Yes, it is limited only to his legitime.
C.	Disinheritance affect only the free portion but not the legitime
D.	None of the above.
Answer» A. No, it also covers the free portion.

1.7k

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Philippines Civil Law Society

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

X was disinherited by his father Y. In the probate of Y’s will, can the children of X represent their disinherited father?
A died without leaving a compulsory heir. Before he died, he donated his properties to the church. After his death, his brothers questioned the validity of the donation. Is their act correct?
X during his lifetime sold and conveyed two (2) parcels of land to his heirs. After X’s death and the probate of his will, are the conveyed properties subject to collation for determination of the heirs’ legitime?
What is the effect if the second heir dies ahead of the first heir in a fideicommisary substitution? Choose the best answer.
Preterition or omission of one, some, or all the compulsory heirs, or some of compulsory heirs in the direct line whether living at the time of the execution of the will or born after the death of the testator shall:
Disposition captatoria means that the heir shall make provisions in his will:
Disposition Captatoria is void because the heir makes a disposition in his will in favor of:
A died leaving no compulsory heirs except his brothers and sisters of the full blood and a cousin. How shall his estate be partitioned?
Mr. Debtor owes fifteen (15) persons substantial amounts of money. His financial situation indicates that his liabilities for exceed his assets. If Mr. Debtor cedes or assigns his properties to his creditors,
Samson, the son of a wealthy family has always claimed that since childhood, he was not a boy. He played with the girls and did not mingle with the boys. After finishing his course at a university in the Philippines, he went to the US to take up his masteral and doctorate degrees. He consulted several doctors of the possibility of sex transmission from that of male to that of a female. The sex transmission was done in Thailand and which was certified as successful by a medical expert in Manila, hence, he claimed to be a woman. He filed a petition for correction of entry of his record of birth from male to female and his name from Samson to Delailah as he was marrying his fiancé. The lower court granted the petition. Is the order of the court correct?