This party in a reserva troncal is the descendant (brother or sister) whose death gives rise to the reserve and from whom therefore the third degree is counted is known as:

Related MCQs

• In cases of reserve troncal, the reservista can sell the property subject of reserva. True or false?
• In reserve troncal the relatives within third degree coming from the same line inherit from:
• The following can be considered as the rationale behind reserva troncal, except:
• In relation to reserva troncal, the following statements are correct, except:
• A & B lived together as husband and wife without the benefit of marriage. For a few months before his death, A was writing his autobiography and stated that he loved B so much and because of that, they decided to live together as husband and wife, but planned to marry. At the time he was writing his autobiography, B was pregnant and he stated in his autobiography that he was the father of the child inside the womb of B. He died without finishing it and failed to sign the same. Two (2) months thereafter, the child C, was born, hence, B sought to register the child under the name of A but the Local Civil Registrar refused, hence, she filed a suit for mandamus to compel the registrar to register the child under A’s name. She testified as narrated above; D, the father of A testified that during the lifetime of A he lived with B and she was pregnant at that time. E the brother of A likewise testified along the same line. Is the action of B correct?
• In 1980, during the lifetime of A’s parents he executed a waiver of right over his future inheritance in favor of his brother B. A predeceased his parents. After the death of his parents in 2010, B obtained a title over the whole estate. Can A’s children recover their father’s share?
• A executed a will in his handwriting with three (3) witnesses, one of whom is the notary public. The probate was contested on the ground that the notary public before whom it was acknowledged was one of the witnesses. How do you think the court will decide?
• No. 1 - the same act of negligence of the defendant that causes injury to another may give rise to a liability based on culpa aquiliana and culpa criminal and the injured party may recover twice from the same act or omission of the defendant. No. 2 - When the defendant causes damage to the plaintiff through the formers fault or negligence, there being no contractual relationship between them, the basis of the defendant’s liability is a quasi-contract.
• A executed a will instituting his heirs and X, his illegitimate child whom he recognized. Before his death, he revoked the will. What is the effect of the revocation of the will?
• X and Y sold a house and lot to their son valued at P10M for only P3M with the condition that it will be delivered after their death. After their death, should the property be brought to collation?