[Solved] A is a squatter on the land of B and constructed a house. When sued for forcible entry, he asked for reimbursement from B for the improvements. Is A correct?

Q.	A is a squatter on the land of B and constructed a house. When sued for forcible entry, he asked for reimbursement from B for the improvements. Is A correct?
A.	Yes, he is entitled to the extent of the value of the improvement;
B.	Yes, to the extent of 50% of the value of the improvement;
C.	Yes, but only for the expenses in the preservation of the land; (Art. 449, NCC)
D.	Yes, for the value of the necessary improvement.
Answer» C. Yes, but only for the expenses in the preservation of the land; (Art. 449, NCC)

814

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Philippines Civil Law Society

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

X leased real property situated in Malate, Manila which is owned by A. During the period of lease, X introduced improvements. Upon the expiration of the lease, A demanded X to vacate the premises but not appropriate the improvement. Is X entitled to reimbursement of the improvements?
X and Y are married. They were leasing a parcel of land in 2007; they constructed a house on the leased lot valued at P1M and resided thereon. While in business, they incurred liability from Z who sued them for failure to pay. Judgment was rendered and it became final and executory. Can the house be levied upon?
A tolerated B to use his land, hence, B constructed a road where his trucks would pass through, going in and out of his land. Fifty (50) years thereafter, A asked B to pay rentals but B refused contending that he has already acquired ownership over the easement of right of way by prescription. Is B correct?
A leased a parcel of land from B. With the consent of B, A constructed his house. If B will file an application for registration of the land, what will happen to the house?
A and B got married without the benefit of a license. During the marriage, A left B and got married to C, hence, B sued A for bigamy. In the meantime A sued B for declaration of nullity of their marriage and moved for the suspension of the criminal case. Will the action prosper?
A, B & C are the co-owners of a parcel of land. A constructed his house at the middle of the property, such that, when they partitioned it, his house was found to be intruding into the share of B. What is the right of B?
X brought a house and lot from Y valued at P5M. He paid P3M and for the balance, he executed a promissory note with interest at 10% to be paid within 90 days. ABC Corporation executed a surety for the balance. X failed to pay, hence, ABC paid the amount and sued X for the interest and the principal. X contended that he is not bound due to novation when Y accepted the security. Is X correct?
A is the owner of a parcel of land adjoining B’s lot. B, knowing that the lot did not belong to him constructed his house on the lot belonging to A. Which of the following is the not correct?
A built his house on his lot up to the boundary line and opened windows with direct view over the lot of B. Twenty (20) years later, B built his house up to the boundary line of his lot, hence, A filed a complaint enjoining B from building his house up to the boundary contending that he has acquired the easement of light and view by prescription and that B cannot build less than 3 meters from the boundary. Is A correct?
A is an owner of a horse. He asked B to take care of it while reviewing for the Bar Exams. After the examination, he went to B to get back the horse but as he got near the horse, he was kicked by the horse on his face resulting in his blindness. He sued B for damages. Is B liable for damages?