X leased real property situated in Malate, Manila which is owned by A. During the period of lease, X introduced improvements. Upon the expiration of the lease, A demanded X to vacate the premises but not appropriate the improvement. Is X entitled to reimbursement of the improvements?

Related MCQs

• Which provision of the Condominium Act (RA 4796) is correct? 1. A condominium corporation shall not, during its existence, sell, exchange, and lease or otherwise dispose of the common areas owned by or held by in the condominium project unless authorized by the affirmative vote of all the stockholders or members. 2. Whenever real property has been divided into condominiums, each condominium separately owned shall be separately assessed, for purposes of real property taxation and other tax purposes, to the owners thereof and tax on each such condominium shall constitute a lien solely thereon.
• A was employed by ABC Co. as manager in Metro Manila subject to the condition that if A will be severed from the company, voluntarily or involuntarily, he cannot get involved in any business of the same nature with ABC’s business in Metro Manila within a period of six (6) months from severance. Is the stipulation valid?
• A constituted B as his agent to sell his property. B found C as the buyer who was willing to buy under the terms agreed upon but suddenly A changed his mind and decided not to sell the property. One week later, A and C, entered into a contract of sale over the property. Is B entitled to commission?
• Excited over their impending marriage, the parties overlooked the expiration date of their marriage license but just the same the marriage was solemnized two days after its expiration date. The marriage is:
• A, an American citizen is married to B, a Filipina. Through the pension and savings of A, they acquired a residential lot in Manila, but it was registered under B’s name. B sold the property to C. Can A seek to recover the property?
• A is a squatter on the land of B and constructed a house. When sued for forcible entry, he asked for reimbursement from B for the improvements. Is A correct?
• Magdalene and Shantung Company entered into a contract of agency before the consul general of the Philippines in Singapore. They stipulated that Magdalene shall be the administrator of the real properties of Shantung Company in the said country. By virtue of the said contract, Magdalene sold the 1 hectare land of Shantung Company located in Singapore to Mayhem Real Estate Corporation without any special power of attorney. The said contract of sale was executed before the vice consul of the Philippines in Singapore. Under the laws of Singapore, the sale of a real property by an agent without a special power of attorney is valid. Shantung Company filed a suit for the annulment of the contract of sale on the ground that Magdalene has no authority to sell the property. If you were the judge, which of the following courses of action should you take?
• A contract of lease was entered into between A & B with a provision that it is for a period of 5 years renewable for another 5 years. The contract expired on June 30, 2010 but up to now, the lessee is still in possession of the premises. What does the implicit renewal of the contract mean?
• A possessor in bad faith of a land is entitled for reimbursement as a matter of right?
• In 1990, A, B & C purchased a real property but agreed that the same be registered under the name of A. In 2009, B & C asked for partition, but A contended that he was already the exclusive owner more than 20 years on the ground of laches having lapsed since the registration of the property under his name. Is A correct?