A and B entered into a contract, subject to the condition that in case the Senate will not concur in to the treaty, neither party will be liable. The Senate rejected it. Can A invoke force majeure or fortuitous event as a ground to exempt himself from liability?

Related MCQs

• Jose is under obligation to deliver to Pedro, at the option of Jose, a car, a pick-up truck, or a van, all of which are specific. No. 1 - If the car and the pick-up truck were lost through Jose’s fault, he has no choice but to deliver the van; If the van was lost through a fortuitous event before delivery, the obligation is extinguished and Jose is not liable. No. 2 - If the pick-up truck and the car were lost through a fortuitous event, Jose has no choice but to deliver the van; if before delivery, the van was lost because of Jose’s fault, he is liable.
• Magdalene and Shantung Company entered into a contract of agency before the consul general of the Philippines in Singapore. They stipulated that Magdalene shall be the administrator of the real properties of Shantung Company in the said country. By virtue of the said contract, Magdalene sold the 1 hectare land of Shantung Company located in Singapore to Mayhem Real Estate Corporation without any special power of attorney. The said contract of sale was executed before the vice consul of the Philippines in Singapore. Under the laws of Singapore, the sale of a real property by an agent without a special power of attorney is valid. Shantung Company filed a suit for the annulment of the contract of sale on the ground that Magdalene has no authority to sell the property. If you were the judge, which of the following courses of action should you take?
• A & B entered into a contract of sale, A, obligating himself to deliver his house and lot to B who obligated himself to pay P2M upon delivery. B has already paid, but A has not delivered the house and lot despite demand. State the remedy of B.
• A and B entered into a contract for B to construct the house of A for P10M. XYZ are partners engaged in the construction of houses. As they are friends of A, they told him that they can construct his house for only P8M and told him to cancel the contract with B. He cancelled the contract with B. What is the right of B?
• A and B entered into a contract of sale over A’s property. The document that evidences the contract did not state how much was paid, but A delivered the property to B. What is the nature of the contract?
• A and B entered into a contract for A to construct a 20-door apartment for B. Payment shall start after the construction of ten (10). A subsequent agreement was entered into that payment will start after construction of seven (7). What is the effect of the subsequent agreement?
• No. 1 - the same act of negligence of the defendant that causes injury to another may give rise to a liability based on culpa aquiliana and culpa criminal and the injured party may recover twice from the same act or omission of the defendant. No. 2 - When the defendant causes damage to the plaintiff through the formers fault or negligence, there being no contractual relationship between them, the basis of the defendant’s liability is a quasi-contract.
• ABS-CBN entered into a contract with WR under certain terms and conditions. Both parties violated their contract, to the extent that WR transferred to another station despite the contract.
• A entered into a contract of sale over his undivided 1/5 of the estate of his father during the pendency of the intestate proceeding with the condition that the same shall be approved by the intestate court. Is the contract valid?
• A contract of lease was entered into between A & B with a provision that it is for a period of 5 years renewable for another 5 years. The contract expired on June 30, 2010 but up to now, the lessee is still in possession of the premises. What does the implicit renewal of the contract mean?