[Solved] In a residential subdivision in San Pedro, Laguna, Marimar constructed and maintained a shoe factory which emits pollution and very loud noise 24 hours a day. How do you classify this nuisance?

Q.	In a residential subdivision in San Pedro, Laguna, Marimar constructed and maintained a shoe factory which emits pollution and very loud noise 24 hours a day. How do you classify this nuisance?
A.	Nuisance per se, because it is always a nuisance, regardless of its location and surroundings.
B.	Nuisance per accidents, because it is only a nuisance based on its location and circumstances.
C.	Nuisance per se, because it affects the entire subdivision
D.	Nuisance per accidents, because it affects and annoys the entire residential subdivision.
Answer» B. Nuisance per accidents, because it is only a nuisance based on its location and circumstances.

2.5k

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Philippines Civil Law Society

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

Pedro borrowed money from Jose, payable on November 26, 2005. On the due date of the obligation, Pedro failed to pay. On December 30, 2005, Pedro paid the debt.
A, B, C and D are the heirs of X and Y who left an estate of 10 hectares in Laguna. The three (3) brothers agreed to convert the land from a riceland to a subdivision. D, the sister disagreed. Is D’s act valid and what is the remedy of the brothers?
Pedro receives a package via Federal Express. When he opened the package he realized that the same was delivered to him by mistake and that the real owner thereof is Pablo, his neighbor. The obligation of Pedro to give the package to Pablo arises from
A is the owner of a parcel of land, which is a part of a subdivision property being developed by XYZ Corporation. His lot is adjacent to the road belonging to ABC Corporation hence, he used to pass through the road going to the national highway. In 2009, ABC Corporation constructed a fence on its property, thus closing the road. Can A demand the reopening of the road?
A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 123 located in a subdivision property being developed by XYZ Corporation. He did not know the exact location of the lot, hence, he consulted the developer who pointed to a lot, hence, he constructed his house. It turned out that it was another lot covered by TCT No. 124. Is A a builder in good faith?
The following are the remedies against private nuisance, except.
Is a swimming pool an attractive nuisance?
Jose is under obligation to deliver to Pedro, at the option of Jose, a car, a pick-up truck, or a van, all of which are specific. No. 1 - If the car and the pick-up truck were lost through Jose’s fault, he has no choice but to deliver the van; If the van was lost through a fortuitous event before delivery, the obligation is extinguished and Jose is not liable. No. 2 - If the pick-up truck and the car were lost through a fortuitous event, Jose has no choice but to deliver the van; if before delivery, the van was lost because of Jose’s fault, he is liable.
Pedro offered to sell to Marita a purported diamond ring which actually was a stone of inferior quality. Believing it to be a genuine diamond ring, Marita bought and paid for the ring. If later on, Marita discovers the misrepresentation, Marita may:
A has been using the name Pedro since birth although his record of birth shows that his name is Juan. He is now 25 years old and about to take the Bar Exams. How can he use the name Juan when he will take the Bar Exams?