A is the owner of a parcel of land, which is a part of a subdivision property being developed by XYZ Corporation. His lot is adjacent to the road belonging to ABC Corporation hence, he used to pass through the road going to the national highway. In 2009, ABC Corporation constructed a fence on its property, thus closing the road. Can A demand the reopening of the road?

Related MCQs

• A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 123 located in a subdivision property being developed by XYZ Corporation. He did not know the exact location of the lot, hence, he consulted the developer who pointed to a lot, hence, he constructed his house. It turned out that it was another lot covered by TCT No. 124. Is A a builder in good faith?
• A is the owner of a parcel of land adjoining B’s lot. B, knowing that the lot did not belong to him constructed his house on the lot belonging to A. Which of the following is the not correct?
• A tolerated B to use his land, hence, B constructed a road where his trucks would pass through, going in and out of his land. Fifty (50) years thereafter, A asked B to pay rentals but B refused contending that he has already acquired ownership over the easement of right of way by prescription. Is B correct?
• A built his house on his lot up to the boundary line and opened windows with direct view over the lot of B. Twenty (20) years later, B built his house up to the boundary line of his lot, hence, A filed a complaint enjoining B from building his house up to the boundary contending that he has acquired the easement of light and view by prescription and that B cannot build less than 3 meters from the boundary. Is A correct?
• A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 1. Through an oral agreement between B & A. A agreed that the property be registered under the name of B so that he can use it in securing a loan with Metrobank. When A sought to recover the property from B, the latter refused contending that he was the owner of the same. Is the contention of B correct?
• X and Y entered into a contract of sale over a parcel of land with an area of 4,000 square meters more or less. When the title was issued, it was 14,475 sq. meters. The buyer contended that he owned the whole lot of 14,475 sq. meters as it was sold in lump sum, hence, the seller should deliver the whole lot. Is the buyer correct?
• The Municipality of Dingras, Ilocos Norte conducted a bidding on the lot belonging to Mr. P for non-payment of tax. A was the highest bidder. P was not able to redeem his property, hence, a title was issued in favor of A. He filed a motion for the issuance of a writ of possession over the house and lot. What is the right of Mr. P?
• A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by a TCT No. 1. B stole the title, forged his signature and transferred it under his name. TCT No. 2 was issued under his name. He sold it to C who registered under his name. When returned to the Philippine in 2010, he discovered that his title was transferred to another. Can he recover the same?
• A sold a parcel of land to B covered by TCT NO. 152 with C as a witness. When D wanted to buy a property, he executed a special power of attorney for E to buy a property for him. E entered into a contract of sale with A for the purchase of the same lot and registered it under the name of D. Who between B and D has a better right over the lot?
• X brought a house and lot from Y valued at P5M. He paid P3M and for the balance, he executed a promissory note with interest at 10% to be paid within 90 days. ABC Corporation executed a surety for the balance. X failed to pay, hence, ABC paid the amount and sued X for the interest and the principal. X contended that he is not bound due to novation when Y accepted the security. Is X correct?