[Solved] A, B and C are the co-owners of a parcel of land located in the City of Manila consisting of 90 square meters. A sued B and C for partition. How do you thing the court will decide?

Q.	A, B and C are the co-owners of a parcel of land located in the City of Manila consisting of 90 square meters. A sued B and C for partition. How do you thing the court will decide?
A.	It will grant the action since land is basically divisible;
B.	It will dismiss because the land is so small;
C.	It will dismiss because the land is so small that to divide it will render it useless for the purpose it is intended;
D.	It will grant the action otherwise, A, B and C will be deprived of their right to make use of the property.
Answer» C. It will dismiss because the land is so small that to divide it will render it useless for the purpose it is intended;

518

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Philippines Civil Law Society

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

A owns a parcel of land. Through the natural current of the river, there was a gradual increase in the area from 11,000 square meters to 13,000 square meters in a period of 8 years. Can A register the land?
X and Y entered into a contract of sale over a parcel of land with an area of 4,000 square meters more or less. When the title was issued, it was 14,475 sq. meters. The buyer contended that he owned the whole lot of 14,475 sq. meters as it was sold in lump sum, hence, the seller should deliver the whole lot. Is the buyer correct?
A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 1 consisting of 10,000 square meters more of less adjoining the river bank. Accretion was formed which has been in the possession of B in 1990, but it was disposed of by the Director of Lands to B in s2010. Is the Director correct?
Mr. Seller and Mr. Buyer orally agreed on the following: (i) the land to be sold has an area of 10,000 sq. meters; (ii) price is P5 million; and (iii) Mr. Seller shall prepare the deed of sale. With fraudulent intent, Mr. Seller knowing the inadequacies of Mr. Buyer with respect to numbers wrote 1,000 sq. meters instead of 10,000 sq. meters. The sale is
A, B, C & D are the co-owners of a parcel of land. They agreed to orally partition the property. Is the partition valid?
A sold a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 9 to B. At the time of the sale, B knew that C has been in possession of the parcel of land as early as 10 years before the sale. B however checked with the Registry of Deeds and found the title to be clean. Is B a buyer in good faith?
A was employed by ABC Co. as manager in Metro Manila subject to the condition that if A will be severed from the company, voluntarily or involuntarily, he cannot get involved in any business of the same nature with ABC’s business in Metro Manila within a period of six (6) months from severance. Is the stipulation valid?
X and Y are married. They were leasing a parcel of land in 2007; they constructed a house on the leased lot valued at P1M and resided thereon. While in business, they incurred liability from Z who sued them for failure to pay. Judgment was rendered and it became final and executory. Can the house be levied upon?
A, B & C are the co-owners of a parcel of land. They leased it to D. For failure to pay the rents, A alone sued D. Will the action prosper?
A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 1. He leased it to B. When sued for ejectment, B contended that A’s title is void. Is he correct?