[Solved] A, B, C, D are the co-owners of a parcel of land. A sold his undivided share to X with the knowledge of his co-owners. One (1) year after the sale, they wanted to exercise the right of legal redemption, but A and X refused. Whose contention is correct?

Q.	A, B, C, D are the co-owners of a parcel of land. A sold his undivided share to X with the knowledge of his co-owners. One (1) year after the sale, they wanted to exercise the right of legal redemption, but A and X refused. Whose contention is correct?
A.	They are not entitled to exercise the right of legal redemption because the 30-day period has already lapsed as they knew of the sale;
B.	They can exercise the right of legal redemption within 20-days from receipt of written notice of the sale;
C.	They cannot exercise the right of legal redemption because knowledge of the sale is not equivalent to registration hence, the 30-day period has already lapsed;
D.	They cannot exercise the right of legal redemption due to estoppel.
Answer» A. They are not entitled to exercise the right of legal redemption because the 30-day period has already lapsed as they knew of the sale;

650

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Philippines Civil Law Society

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

A sold a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 9 to B. At the time of the sale, B knew that C has been in possession of the parcel of land as early as 10 years before the sale. B however checked with the Registry of Deeds and found the title to be clean. Is B a buyer in good faith?
A & B are married with children C & D, but were living separately from one another. A got married to E and begot children, F & G. After his death, E, F & G filed a petition for settlement of his estate. B, C &D intervened to claim their share of the estate and contended that since F & G are illegitimate as the marriage of A & E is void, their share is only ½ of the share of the legitimates. Is the contention correct?
A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 1. Through an oral agreement between B & A. A agreed that the property be registered under the name of B so that he can use it in securing a loan with Metrobank. When A sought to recover the property from B, the latter refused contending that he was the owner of the same. Is the contention of B correct?
Mr. S sold his land to Mr. B with a right to repurchase within ten years from the date of sale. Despite the lapse of the period of redemption, no such redemption was made.
A sold a parcel of land to B covered by TCT NO. 152 with C as a witness. When D wanted to buy a property, he executed a special power of attorney for E to buy a property for him. E entered into a contract of sale with A for the purchase of the same lot and registered it under the name of D. Who between B and D has a better right over the lot?
A tolerated B to use his land, hence, B constructed a road where his trucks would pass through, going in and out of his land. Fifty (50) years thereafter, A asked B to pay rentals but B refused contending that he has already acquired ownership over the easement of right of way by prescription. Is B correct?
A & B are married. They have properties and they are governed by the conjugal partnership of gains. They negotiated for the sale of one (1) of their properties to C, but when the signing of the contract came, B did not consent to the sale. During the negotiation, they delivered the property to C. Is the sale valid?
A & B lived together as husband and wife without the benefit of marriage. For a few months before his death, A was writing his autobiography and stated that he loved B so much and because of that, they decided to live together as husband and wife, but planned to marry. At the time he was writing his autobiography, B was pregnant and he stated in his autobiography that he was the father of the child inside the womb of B. He died without finishing it and failed to sign the same. Two (2) months thereafter, the child C, was born, hence, B sought to register the child under the name of A but the Local Civil Registrar refused, hence, she filed a suit for mandamus to compel the registrar to register the child under A’s name. She testified as narrated above; D, the father of A testified that during the lifetime of A he lived with B and she was pregnant at that time. E the brother of A likewise testified along the same line. Is the action of B correct?
Wendy, single, bought a parcel of land in Dagupan City from Amante for P600,000.00. A contract was executed between them which already vested upon Wendy full ownership of the property, although payable in monthly installments for a period of 4 years. One year after the execution of the contract, Wendy got married to Lorenzo. They executed a marriage settlement whereby they agreed that their properties shall be governed by the regime of conjugal partnership of gains. Thereafter, subsequent installments were paid from the conjugal partnership funds. Is the land conjugal or paraphernal?
A wrote his brother B authorizing the latter to sell a parcel of land belonging to him located in Cagayan Valley. On the strength of such letter-authority, B sold the land. Is the sale valid?