Who argued that there is no justification for severe punishment?

Related MCQs

• Who argued that when a punishment quickly follows a crime, then the two ideas of crime and punishment will be more closely associated in a person’s mind?
• Who argued that punishment is justified only to defend social contract
• Who argued that the method of punishment selected should be that which serves the greatest public good?
• Who argued that punishment should serve to deter others from committing crimes, and to prevent the criminal from repeating his crimes
• Who argued that the temporal proximity of the punishment is needed to maximize deterrence value?
• Name the criminologist who argued that the swiftness of punishment has the greatest impact on deterring others from crime?
• Who argued that in time we will naturally grow accustomed to increases in severity of punishment and thus the initial increase in severity will lose its effects?
• Which criminologist argued that there are limits both to how much torment we can endure and also how much we can inflict?
• Among the following who argued that crime can be understood only if it is studied by scientific methods?
• Who argued that criminal justice should conform to rational principles?