[Solved] In case of roots of a neighboring tree intruded to the state of another, the neighboring owner has the right to cut it off.

Q.	In case of roots of a neighboring tree intruded to the state of another, the neighboring owner has the right to cut it off.
A.	Yes, only after his demand for the cutting is ignored.
B.	Yes, because he owns the roots that intruded at his property.
C.	No, without permission from the owner of the tree.
D.	Yes, only after 10 years of prescription.
Answer» B. Yes, because he owns the roots that intruded at his property.

854

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Philippines Civil Law Society

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

Mr. X planted a mango tree at the edge of the boundary line of his (X) land with Mr. B. After ten years branches of the mango tree encroached the air space of B. Mr. X is the owner of the encroaching branches because…
Which statement is correct? 1. Accession is the right of an owner of a property to everything which is produced thereby or which is incorporated or attached thereto either naturally or artificially. 2. Natural, industrial and civil fruits belong to the owner.
In the establishment of an easement of right of way which is likened to the exercise of the power of eminent domain, the owner can validly contend that the compensation due the owner should be computed based on the
In the contract of usufruct, the owner of the property is being called the naked owner. Why?
In formation of an island, the owner of the nearest margin/distance is the owner of the new island?
A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 1. Through an oral agreement between B & A. A agreed that the property be registered under the name of B so that he can use it in securing a loan with Metrobank. When A sought to recover the property from B, the latter refused contending that he was the owner of the same. Is the contention of B correct?
A is a contractor, building roads for the government which has not paid him P100M. Before he filed his income tax returns, he wrote a letter to the BIR Commissioner proposing a set-off between the State and A considering that his tax liability amounts to P10M and the State has not paid him despite demand. Is A correct?
What is the remedy of an owner of a titled land in case it was registered by another with the use of fraud under his name?
A is indebted to ABC Corporation in the amount of P100M. Despite efforts to collect from A, the latter failed to pay due to business reverses as he has no more assets. In order to maintain a more accurate inventory of the worth of its current assets, ABC Corp. was forced to write-off A’s obligation. One (1) year later, A won the lotto draw in the US in the amount of $100M. Learning of the good luck of A, it demanded for payment, but A refused to pay contending that his obligation was extinguished when it was written-off. Is A correct?
Whenever the current of a torrent segregates a known portion of the land and transfers it to another, the owner of the land to which the segregated portion belonged retains the ownership of it. What do you call the process?