[Solved] If there is a subdivision lot buyer and there is no development and he does not pay, to what extent can he ask for reimbursement of his payments?

Q.	If there is a subdivision lot buyer and there is no development and he does not pay, to what extent can he ask for reimbursement of his payments?
A.	Total amount paid;
B.	25%;
C.	50%;
D.	Total amount paid including interest but excluding delinquency interest at the legal rate.
Answer» D. Total amount paid including interest but excluding delinquency interest at the legal rate.

1.8k

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Philippines Civil Law Society

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

A is the owner of a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 123 located in a subdivision property being developed by XYZ Corporation. He did not know the exact location of the lot, hence, he consulted the developer who pointed to a lot, hence, he constructed his house. It turned out that it was another lot covered by TCT No. 124. Is A a builder in good faith?
A built his house on his lot up to the boundary line and opened windows with direct view over the lot of B. Twenty (20) years later, B built his house up to the boundary line of his lot, hence, A filed a complaint enjoining B from building his house up to the boundary contending that he has acquired the easement of light and view by prescription and that B cannot build less than 3 meters from the boundary. Is A correct?
If the buyer of a subdivision lot in a contract to sell under the Maceda Lawfails to pay after payment of at least two (2) years of installments, can he still pay the balance?
The following rules are correct in case the buyer of a subdivision lot fails to pay the installments, except:
Seller wrote a letter to Buyer offering to sell a piece of land for P500,000. Seller gave Buyer two months to decide and pay the purchase price. Before the lapse of two months, Seller wrote Buyer that the price is now P700,000. Buyer insisted on an acceptance for P500,000. He wants to compel Seller to execute a deed of sale for the original offer of P500,000. May the Seller be compelled to honor the P500,000 offer?
A is the owner of a parcel of land adjoining B’s lot. B, knowing that the lot did not belong to him constructed his house on the lot belonging to A. Which of the following is the not correct?
X and Y entered into a contract of sale over a parcel of land with an area of 4,000 square meters more or less. When the title was issued, it was 14,475 sq. meters. The buyer contended that he owned the whole lot of 14,475 sq. meters as it was sold in lump sum, hence, the seller should deliver the whole lot. Is the buyer correct?
A & B entered into a contract of sale, A, obligating himself to deliver his house and lot to B who obligated himself to pay P2M upon delivery. B has already paid, but A has not delivered the house and lot despite demand. State the remedy of B.
A entered into a contract of sale over B’s house and lot but since there is a balance which remained unpaid, A executed a mortgage over the house and lot. A failed to pay. Can B rescind the contract?
The guarantor paid the obligation of the debtor when demand is made. Can he ask for reimbursement?