[Solved] When is the hotelkeeper shall be liable for the loss of the things belonging to the guests?

Q.	When is the hotelkeeper shall be liable for the loss of the things belonging to the guests?
A.	If the things were actually delivered or surrendered to the hotelkeeper.
B.	If the guests did not sign any waiver of liability.
C.	If the hotelkeeper was notified of the valuables and the guests took the necessary measure to the care and vigilance over the same.
D.	If the loss was due to the act of a thief done with the use of irresistible force.
Answer» C. If the hotelkeeper was notified of the valuables and the guests took the necessary measure to the care and vigilance over the same.

2.8k

Do you find this helpful?

View all MCQs in

Philippines Civil Law Society

Discussion

No comments yet

Related MCQs

Jose is under obligation to deliver to Pedro, at the option of Jose, a car, a pick-up truck, or a van, all of which are specific. No. 1 - If the car and the pick-up truck were lost through Jose’s fault, he has no choice but to deliver the van; If the van was lost through a fortuitous event before delivery, the obligation is extinguished and Jose is not liable. No. 2 - If the pick-up truck and the car were lost through a fortuitous event, Jose has no choice but to deliver the van; if before delivery, the van was lost because of Jose’s fault, he is liable.
When two or more persons are liable under a contract or under a judgment to presumption is that their obligations is solidary and each debtor is liable for the entire obligations.
Which provision of the Condominium Act (RA 4796) is correct? 1. A condominium corporation shall not, during its existence, sell, exchange, and lease or otherwise dispose of the common areas owned by or held by in the condominium project unless authorized by the affirmative vote of all the stockholders or members. 2. Whenever real property has been divided into condominiums, each condominium separately owned shall be separately assessed, for purposes of real property taxation and other tax purposes, to the owners thereof and tax on each such condominium shall constitute a lien solely thereon.
X is not a partner of A, B, and C. Without the consent or knowledge of C but with the implied consent of A and B, X made T believe that he is a partner of A, B, and C. Who shall be liable for the payment of a debt of P500, 000 in favor of T who extended credit on the basis of the misrepresentation?
A debt has a maturity date of November 1, 2004. Payment was made on November 1, 2005 but demand was made on June 1, 2005. If the debtor is made liable for interest, the interest shall commence to run on
X, Y, and Z are partners in XYZ Partnership, Ltd. Y as limited partner. After five years of operations, the partnership incurred debts in favor of third persons totaling P5 million. The total partnership assets is P3 million. Who among the partners shall be liable with their separate property in favor of creditors?
The guardian of an imbecile shall be civilly liable as principal for the crime committed by the imbecile alone.
A and B are married. A, with the use of fraud, sold a parcel of land belonging to them in 1990. B discovered it in 2011. Can he still file an action to declare the sale void?
The Municipality of Dingras, Ilocos Norte conducted a bidding on the lot belonging to Mr. P for non-payment of tax. A was the highest bidder. P was not able to redeem his property, hence, a title was issued in favor of A. He filed a motion for the issuance of a writ of possession over the house and lot. What is the right of Mr. P?
A is the owner of a parcel of land, which is a part of a subdivision property being developed by XYZ Corporation. His lot is adjacent to the road belonging to ABC Corporation hence, he used to pass through the road going to the national highway. In 2009, ABC Corporation constructed a fence on its property, thus closing the road. Can A demand the reopening of the road?